Children’s book illustrations comes in many different styles,
ranging from cute drawings to obscure visuals that helps brings the essence of
the story’s narrative to the readers. The methodologies in children’s book
illustrations are all varied, usually stemming from the style of the artist who
is creating the illustrations for the children’s book. The majority of these
are usually traditional painted visuals, as well as digital pieces, although
that doesn’t restrict them from using any medium at all.
Sarah Fanelli’s technique in creating her illustrations for
children’s book uses collage as her primary tool to produce bizarre, yet
interesting and appealing visuals and broken away from the traditional way of
illustrating for children, by using cut-outs of photographed and photocopied
eyes as her textural interests and style. Her methodologies is ‘photocollage’,
by adding a human element that is recognizable (eyes, nose, teeth) to any drawing,
to create abstract compositions.
‘Argus
the monster with 100 eyes’, Mythological
Monsters, 2005, Sara Fanelli
Experiments using Fanelli’s technique of using photographed
and photocopied eyes on my simple drawings of characters on coloured
backgrounds, making each one unique and somewhat absurd and appealing at the
same time. The eyes is what give the characters life and there was very little
effort in drawing them, as they consists of quick, simple scribbles to create
their arms and legs, which relates to the quote by Fanelli, (1) “Scribbles, often have a visual function – they appear where I want some
energy in the picture, but not too dominant.”

Another experiment using the ones I did earlier but mixing
the character’s heads and bodies with one and another, generating new
characters and surreal combinations. This idea can relate to Anthropomorphism
in a way, where we add human elements to other things rather than animals which
is always a popular choice. In a way this experiment can relate to ‘Absurd
Anthropomorphism’, where we give human behaviours instead of physical human
features to unexpected objects, such as the artist Edward Lear, whose poem,
“The Table and the Chair” consists of two unexpected characters, the table and
the chair with human behaviour. Both Fanelli and Lear uses absurdity for their
characters, making them unconventionally funny and to surprise the readers
(given that Fanelli uses this a lot to appeal children by surprising them).
Experiment based on Edward Lear’s characters from the poem “The
Table and the Chair”. Lear’s characters does not have any form of physical
human characteristics, which can be hard to identify as characters visually,
unless they speak. Here is to demonstrate that by giving them human like
features such as arms and legs, regardless whether they do not speak, they show
to the audience signs of activity and characteristics. Without these we would
simply see them as objects, nothing more. We as audience have gotten used to
identify things with limbs as characters, in film, television, illustration
(especially in children’s books), regardless how cliché or obscure they are,
relating to my earlier point of ‘Absurd Anthropomorphism’, but more of a
physical aspect than a behavioural one.
References
(1) Robins
Bibliography
Robins, G. Books for
Keeps, The Children’s Book Magazine Online [Online] Date Accessed: 1st
Nov 2015. Available from: http://booksforkeeps.co.uk/issue/195/childrens-books/articles/the-dream-like-images-of-sara-fanelli
Images
Mythological
Monsters, 2005, Sara Fanelli [Online] [Date Accessed: 1st
Nov 2015] Available from: https://simonsterg.wordpress.com/tag/sara-fanelli/










